Postby frabjous » Tue Aug 31, 2010 5:46 pm
Too much work? Of course it is, but it's worth starting out that way just to be sure the problem isn't with your files.
You can customize the compiler tools with edit > preferences > typesetting. You could, for example, have it call a batch file that called these tools in order (just be sure to include -synctex=1 to make use of texworks forward/reverse search capabilities). Or if you have latexmk installed, you can tell it to use that. (Again, make sure latexmk is configured to call the synctex option.) I'd give details, but I don't use Windows.
However, I'm not quite sure though what would drive a person to switch from linux with emacs to Windows with TeXworks. Isn't that sort of like switching from a swiss army knife to a plastic butterknife? You know, you can run emacs on Windows too (if you must!)
In the introduction chapter of my PhD dissertation, I had to make a listing of my publications. The obvious brain dead way to achieve this is just typing everything manually in a list. But this feels just so wrong when you're already using BibTeX for managing references and bibliographical stuff. However, the traditional usage of BibTeX in LaTeX is to generate a full list of all references and put this in a dedicated section or chapter.
With the bibentry package (which is part of the natlib package actually) it is possible to put bibliographic entries anywhere in the text. As far as I know and experienced, the bibentry package is included in a default LaTeX setup, so you don't have to install something, just enable it in your document.
Getting it work as desired can take some trial and error, so I thought it may be a good idea to feed "them search engines" with a working example.
Here is a simple proof of concept example LaTeX document :
The stuff that's important here: - : duh. - : tells bibentry to (re)use the bibliographic data from the standard BibTeX setup by . - : an inline bibliographic entry will be put here.
Here is the accompanying BibTeX file :
And here is what it looks like in the end:
Note the inline entries in the introduction section, the standard references in the second section and how all references show up in the final bibliographic listing. Just how I wanted it in my PhD dissertation. With slightly different content of course.